top of page
Search

The Dark History of Weight Loss Medications: Lessons from 5 Dangerous Drugs and Supplements

  • Writer: Dr. Alexandra LaStella, PharmD
    Dr. Alexandra LaStella, PharmD
  • Sep 1, 2024
  • 5 min read
Introduction

The pursuit of weight loss has been a persistent theme throughout history, often driven by societal pressures, health concerns, and the desire for an idealized body image. Over the decades, various medications, herbs, and supplements have been marketed as quick fixes for weight loss. However, many of these substances were later found to cause severe and sometimes life-threatening adverse effects, leading to their removal from the market. This blog post explores five such weight loss agents, detailing their history, associated adverse events, and the lessons we can learn from their misuse. We’ll also discuss the importance of caution in using current weight loss medications, such as Ozempic, which, while popular, may carry unknown long-term risks.



1. Phen-Fen (Fenfluramine and Phentermine)

Phen-Fen, a combination of fenfluramine and phentermine, became widely popular in the 1990s as a weight loss treatment. Fenfluramine works by increasing serotonin levels in the brain, which helps to suppress appetite, while phentermine acts as a stimulant, reducing hunger. The combination was hailed as a revolutionary treatment for obesity, with millions of prescriptions written in the United States.


Despite its popularity, Phen-Fen was associated with severe cardiovascular adverse events, most notably primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH) and valvular heart disease. Studies revealed that fenfluramine and its active metabolite, norfenfluramine, caused damage to heart valves by stimulating serotonin receptors on heart valve cells. This led to the thickening and stiffening of the valves, resulting in valvular insufficiency and heart failure in some cases.


In 1997, after mounting evidence of these serious adverse effects, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requested the voluntary withdrawal of fenfluramine and its related compound, dexfenfluramine, from the market. The subsequent lawsuits and settlements highlighted the dangers of hastily adopting weight loss medications without fully understanding their long-term impact on health



2. Ephedra (Ma Huang)

Ephedra, also known as Ma Huang, is a plant that has been used in traditional Chinese medicine for centuries. In the late 20th century, ephedra gained popularity as a weight loss supplement in the Western world, primarily due to its ability to stimulate the central nervous system, increase metabolism, and promote fat loss. Ephedra supplements were commonly marketed as natural and effective, contributing to their widespread use among those seeking quick weight loss solutions.


Ephedra’s stimulant effects, primarily due to the active ingredient ephedrine, were linked to a range of adverse events, including increased heart rate, hypertension, palpitations, and stroke. More severe outcomes, such as heart attacks and sudden death, were also reported, particularly among individuals with underlying cardiovascular conditions or those who combined ephedra with other stimulants like caffeine.


In 2004, the FDA banned the sale of ephedra-containing dietary supplements after determining that the risks of severe cardiovascular events outweighed any potential benefits. The ban was a landmark decision in the regulation of dietary supplements, underscoring the need for more stringent oversight of weight loss products marketed as natural or herbal remedies.



3. Dinitrophenol (DNP)

Dinitrophenol (DNP) was introduced in the 1930s as a weight loss agent due to its ability to increase metabolic rate by uncoupling oxidative phosphorylation in mitochondria. This process leads to the generation of heat instead of adenosine triphosphate (ATP), causing the body to burn more calories to maintain energy balance. DNP was initially embraced for its effectiveness in promoting rapid weight loss.


The very mechanism that made DNP effective as a weight loss agent also made it extremely dangerous. The uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation leads to hyperthermia, which can cause a range of severe adverse effects, including profuse sweating, tachycardia, dehydration, and fatal hyperpyrexia (extremely high body temperature). DNP’s narrow therapeutic index meant that even slight overdoses could result in life-threatening conditions.


By 1938, the FDA declared DNP to be “extremely dangerous and not fit for human consumption,” leading to its removal from the market. Despite the ban, DNP has resurfaced periodically, particularly on the black market and online forums, where it continues to pose a significant risk to those seeking rapid weight loss.



4. Rimonabant (Acomplia)

Rimonabant, marketed under the brand name Acomplia, was introduced in Europe in 2006 as a weight loss drug. It works as a selective cannabinoid receptor antagonist, specifically blocking the CB1 receptor in the endocannabinoid system. By inhibiting this receptor, rimonabant reduces appetite and promotes weight loss. The drug was also investigated for its potential benefits in smoking cessation and metabolic syndrome.


Despite its initial promise, rimonabant was associated with significant psychiatric adverse effects, including depression, anxiety, and an increased risk of suicidal ideation. These psychiatric symptoms were thought to arise from the drug’s action on the central nervous system, where the endocannabinoid system plays a crucial role in mood regulation.


In 2008, after numerous reports of severe psychiatric events, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) recommended the suspension of rimonabant, and it was subsequently withdrawn from the market. The case of rimonabant highlighted the importance of considering the broader neurological impacts of weight loss drugs, particularly those that target central nervous system pathways.



5. Sibutramine (Meridia)

Sibutramine, marketed as Meridia, was approved by the FDA in 1997 as an appetite suppressant for the treatment of obesity. Sibutramine works by inhibiting the reuptake of serotonin, norepinephrine, and dopamine, leading to increased satiety and reduced caloric intake. It was widely prescribed and considered an effective pharmacological option for weight loss in conjunction with diet and exercise.


While sibutramine was effective in promoting weight loss, it was also associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events, including heart attacks and strokes. The SCOUT (Sibutramine Cardiovascular Outcomes Trial) study, which was conducted to assess the long-term safety of sibutramine, found that patients taking the drug had a significantly higher risk of cardiovascular events compared to those on placebo.


In 2010, based on the results of the SCOUT study and other safety data, the FDA requested the withdrawal of sibutramine from the U.S. market. The withdrawal of sibutramine underscored the importance of long-term safety data in the evaluation of weight loss medications, particularly those that may affect cardiovascular health.



Why It Matters: The Importance of Caution in Weight Loss Medication

The history of weight loss medications and supplements is fraught with examples of substances that were initially celebrated for their effectiveness, only to be later withdrawn due to serious, and sometimes fatal, adverse events. The cases of Phen-Fen, ephedra, DNP, rimonabant, and sibutramine serve as cautionary tales of the potential dangers associated with the pursuit of rapid weight loss.


Today, drugs like Ozempic (semaglutide), which was originally developed for type 2 diabetes but is now being used off-label for weight loss, are gaining popularity. While early results are promising, the long-term effects of these medications on weight loss, metabolic health, and overall well-being remain uncertain. As healthcare professionals, it is crucial to approach such trends with caution, balancing the potential benefits against the unknown risks.


Weight loss should be pursued through evidence-based, sustainable methods that prioritize overall health and well-being. The allure of quick fixes must be tempered with an understanding of the potential harms that may emerge over time. By learning from the past, we can better guide patients in making informed decisions about their weight loss journey, ensuring that their health is protected in the process. By looking to the past and understanding the dangers of weight loss drugs, we can approach current trends with a critical eye and prioritize safety above all




References

  1. Connolly HM, Crary JL, McGoon MD, Hensrud DD, Edwards BS, Edwards WD, Schaff HV. Valvular Heart Disease Associated with Fenfluramine-Phentermine. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(9):581-588.

  2. Bent S, Tiedt TN, Odden MC, Shlipak MG. The relative safety of ephedra compared with other herbal products. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(6):468-471.

  3. Grundlingh J, Dargan PI, El-Zanfaly M, Wood DM. 2,4-Dinitrophenol (DNP): A Weight Loss Agent with Significant Acute Toxicity and Risk of Death. J Med Toxicol. 2011;7(3):205-212.

  4. Christopoulou F, Kontogianni M, Doumas M. Rimonabant: Why Was This Cardiometabolic Medication Withdrawn from the Market? J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2014;5(1):1-5.

  5. James WP, Caterson ID, Coutinho W, et al. Effect of sibutramine on cardiovascular outcomes in overweight and obese subjects. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(10):905-917.


 
 

Recent Posts

See All
bottom of page